Screener
IVAL vs QMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF vs Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF
Key differences
- QMOM costs 0.10% less per year.
- IVAL follows a index tracking strategy; QMOM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, QMOM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IVAL | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $207M | $519M |
| Since | 2014 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.71% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.35% | 23.09% |
| Max drawdown | -46.09% | -39.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IVAL and QMOM
Explore further