Screener
IVRS vs EFG
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
Key differences
- EFG costs 0.13% less per year.
- EFG is significantly larger than IVRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IVRS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IVRS | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $15.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.28% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.0% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.6% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.46 | 0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.71% | 17.22% |
| Max drawdown | -31.43% | -35.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IVRS and EFG
Explore further