Screener
IWB vs HECO
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
Key differences
IWB is an equity ETF, while HECO is an alternative ETF. IWB charges 0.15% a year and HECO 0.90%.
- IWB is an equity fund, while HECO is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- IWB follows a index tracking strategy; HECO uses option income.
- IWB costs 0.75% less per year.
- IWB is much larger than HECO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | HECO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48.9B | $116M |
| Since | 2000 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +117.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.22% | 37.71% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -43.74% |
Similar to IWB and HECO
Explore further