Screener
IWB vs IOO
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs iShares Global 100 ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.25% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than IOO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWB covers north america markets; IOO covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, IOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | IOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46.2B | $8.5B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +40.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | +16.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 1.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 13.63% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -31.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWB and IOO
Explore further