Screener
IWD vs SCHV
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- SCHV costs 0.14% less per year.
- IWD is significantly larger than SCHV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWD | SCHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $74.3B | $15.2B |
| Since | 2000 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.55% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.88% | 10.69% |
| Max drawdown | -38.51% | -37.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWD and SCHV
Explore further