Screener
IWL vs IWN
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.09% less per year.
- IWN is significantly larger than IWL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWL | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2009 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.4% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.7% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.34% | 17.87% |
| Max drawdown | -32.71% | -46.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWL and IWN
Explore further