Screener
IWM vs AOR
iShares Russell 2000 ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
Key differences
- IWM is significantly larger than AOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWM is classified as equity, while AOR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- IWM follows a index tracking strategy; AOR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWM | AOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $76.9B | $3.5B |
| Since | 2000 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 2.53% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +19.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.22% | 8.47% |
| Max drawdown | -41.13% | -22.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWM and AOR
Explore further