Screener
IWM vs QNXT
iShares Russell 2000 ETF vs iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
Key differences
Both IWM and QNXT are equity ETFs. IWM charges 0.19% a year and QNXT 0.20%. The main difference: IWM is much larger than QNXT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWM is much larger than QNXT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWM | QNXT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $80.9B | $19M |
| Since | 2000 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.87% | 0.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.6% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.73% | 15.70% |
| Max drawdown | -41.13% | -22.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.