Screener
IWN vs BUSA
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF vs Brandes U.S. Value ETF
Key differences
- IWN costs 0.36% less per year.
- IWN is significantly larger than BUSA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWN follows a index tracking strategy; BUSA uses active selection.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWN | BUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $292M |
| Since | 2000 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.7% | +23.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.87% | 11.96% |
| Max drawdown | -46.08% | -14.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWN and BUSA
Explore further