Screener
IWN vs OASC
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF vs OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- IWN costs 0.45% less per year.
- IWN is significantly larger than OASC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWN | OASC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $78M |
| Since | 2000 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 0.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.8% | +39.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.92% | 18.21% |
| Max drawdown | -46.08% | -26.99% |
Similar to IWN and OASC
Explore further