Screener
IWO vs GSGO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF vs Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- IWO costs 0.21% less per year.
- IWO is significantly larger than GSGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWO follows a index tracking strategy; GSGO uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWO | GSGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.9B | $163M |
| Since | 2000 | 1999 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.33% | — |
| Max drawdown | -42.01% | -13.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWO and GSGO
Explore further