Screener
IWP vs TMFS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWP costs 0.62% less per year.
- IWP is significantly larger than TMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWP follows a index tracking strategy; TMFS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IWP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWP | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19.6B | $64M |
| Since | 2001 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.5% | +0.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | -0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.56% | 19.64% |
| Max drawdown | -38.62% | -48.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWP and TMFS
Explore further