Screener
IWR vs BBH
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF vs VanEck Biotech ETF
Key differences
Both IWR and BBH are equity ETFs. IWR charges 0.18% a year and BBH 0.35%. The main difference: IWR costs 0.17% less per year.
- IWR costs 0.17% less per year.
- IWR is much larger than BBH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWR | BBH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54.8B | $367M |
| Since | 2001 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.9% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.0% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.2% | -0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.79% | 19.41% |
| Max drawdown | -40.59% | -39.86% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.