Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

IWS vs REVS

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF

IWS

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.23%

Fund size

$14.9B

REVS

Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF

Columbia Threadneedle

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$284M

Key differences

  • IWS is significantly larger than REVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, REVS has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

IWSREVS
Annual cost (TER)0.23%0.19%
Fund size (AUM)$14.9B$284M
Since20012019
Dividend yield1.38%0.97%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+28.0%+28.9%
CAGR 3Y+17.2%+19.1%
CAGR 5Y+8.8%+11.7%
Sharpe 3Y0.881.11
Volatility 1Y13.33%11.62%
Max drawdown-43.83%-37.85%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to IWS and REVS