Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

REVS vs IWD

Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

REVS

Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF

Columbia Threadneedle

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$284M

IWD

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.18%

Fund size

$74.3B

Key differences

  • IWD is significantly larger than REVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • IWD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

REVSIWD
Annual cost (TER)0.19%0.18%
Fund size (AUM)$284M$74.3B
Since20192000
Dividend yield0.97%1.55%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+28.9%+30.0%
CAGR 3Y+19.1%+18.4%
CAGR 5Y+11.7%+10.6%
Sharpe 3Y1.111.09
Volatility 1Y11.62%10.90%
Max drawdown-37.85%-38.51%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to REVS and IWD