Screener
IWY vs IWN
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, IWY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWY | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.5B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2009 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.2% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.7% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.63% | 17.87% |
| Max drawdown | -32.68% | -46.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWY and IWN
Explore further