Screener
IXUS vs CNYA
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF
Key differences
- IXUS costs 0.53% less per year.
- IXUS is significantly larger than CNYA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXUS covers global ex us markets; CNYA covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, IXUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXUS | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $56.2B | $238M |
| Since | 2012 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.94% | 1.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.7% | +35.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.40% | 17.18% |
| Max drawdown | -36.22% | -49.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXUS and CNYA
Explore further