Screener
IXUS vs ECNS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF vs iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IXUS costs 0.52% less per year.
- IXUS is significantly larger than ECNS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXUS covers global ex us markets; ECNS covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, IXUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXUS | ECNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $56.2B | $82M |
| Since | 2012 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.94% | 6.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.7% | +16.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | -6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.40% | 20.87% |
| Max drawdown | -36.22% | -63.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXUS and ECNS
Explore further