Screener
IYG vs BCFN
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF vs Baron Financials ETF
Key differences
- IYG costs 0.42% less per year.
- IYG is significantly larger than BCFN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IYG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IYG | BCFN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $48M |
| Since | 2000 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.11% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.46% | — |
| Max drawdown | -44.32% | -20.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IYG and BCFN
Explore further