Screener
IYM vs IBAT
iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF vs iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
Key differences
- IYM costs 0.09% less per year.
- IYM is significantly larger than IBAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IYM covers north america markets; IBAT covers global.
- IYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IYM | IBAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $65M |
| Since | 2000 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.5% | +117.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.63% | 25.82% |
| Max drawdown | -42.76% | -28.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IYM and IBAT
Explore further