Screener
IYW vs CQQQ
iShares U.S. Technology ETF vs Invesco China Technology ETF
Key differences
- IYW costs 0.27% less per year.
- IYW is significantly larger than CQQQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IYW covers north america markets; CQQQ covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, IYW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IYW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IYW | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21.5B | $2.7B |
| Since | 2000 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 2.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +59.0% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +36.1% | +11.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.0% | -6.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.06% | 29.76% |
| Max drawdown | -39.44% | -73.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IYW and CQQQ
Explore further