Screener
JPAN vs DBJP
Matthews Japan Active ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
Key differences
Both JPAN and DBJP are equity ETFs. JPAN charges 0.79% a year and DBJP 0.45%. The main difference: JPAN follows a active selection strategy; DBJP uses index tracking.
- JPAN follows a active selection strategy; DBJP uses index tracking.
- DBJP costs 0.34% less per year.
- DBJP is much larger than JPAN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- DBJP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| JPAN | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $660M |
| Since | 2023 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 4.34% | 2.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.2% | +48.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +29.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +20.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.92% | 19.03% |
| Max drawdown | -15.25% | -31.30% |
Similar to JPAN and DBJP
Explore further