Screener
JPAN vs MEM
Matthews Japan Active ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- MEM is significantly larger than JPAN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- JPAN follows a index tracking strategy; MEM uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| JPAN | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $53M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.61% | 3.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.4% | +52.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.88% | 20.59% |
| Max drawdown | -15.25% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to JPAN and MEM
Explore further