Screener
KAT vs THIR
Scharf ETF vs THOR Index Rotation ETF
Key differences
- THIR costs 0.06% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than THIR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT follows a active selection strategy; THIR uses index tracking.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KAT | THIR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $688M | $210M |
| Since | 2011 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.55% |
| Max drawdown | -9.25% | -10.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KAT and THIR
Explore further