Screener
KBE vs GNR
State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- KBE costs 0.05% less per year.
- GNR is significantly larger than KBE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KBE covers north america markets; GNR covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, KBE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- KBE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KBE | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $4.9B |
| Since | 2005 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.31% | 2.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +41.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.2% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.59% | 16.41% |
| Max drawdown | -53.14% | -48.59% |
Similar to KBE and GNR
Explore further