Screener
KDRN vs HYLS
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF vs First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
Key differences
- KDRN costs 0.07% less per year.
- HYLS is significantly larger than KDRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KDRN is classified as fixed income, while HYLS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- KDRN follows a index tracking strategy; HYLS uses long short.
- Over the last 3 years, HYLS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HYLS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KDRN | HYLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.62% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 3.12% | 6.65% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.04 | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.64% | 3.56% |
| Max drawdown | -15.29% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KDRN and HYLS
Explore further