Screener
KDRN vs TUGN
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
- TUGN is significantly larger than KDRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KDRN is classified as fixed income, while TUGN is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- KDRN follows a index tracking strategy; TUGN uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, TUGN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KDRN | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.62% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $78M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.12% | 11.46% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +35.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.04 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.64% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -15.29% | -23.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KDRN and TUGN
Explore further