Screener
KDRN vs TUG
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF vs STF Tactical Growth ETF
Key differences
- TUG is significantly larger than KDRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KDRN is classified as fixed income, while TUG is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- KDRN follows a index tracking strategy; TUG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TUG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KDRN | TUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.62% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $42M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.12% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | fixed income | mixed asset |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +38.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.04 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.64% | 16.15% |
| Max drawdown | -15.29% | -22.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KDRN and TUG
Explore further