Screener
KEAT vs PSC
Keating Active ETF vs Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- PSC costs 0.47% less per year.
- PSC is significantly larger than KEAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KEAT follows a active selection strategy; PSC uses index tracking.
- PSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEAT | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $120M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.20% | 0.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.23% | 18.83% |
| Max drawdown | -7.45% | -46.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEAT and PSC
Explore further