Screener
KEMX vs KWEB
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF vs KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Key differences
- KEMX costs 0.46% less per year.
- KWEB is significantly larger than KEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- KWEB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEMX | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $6.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +74.0% | -15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.4% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.0% | -14.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.30 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.26% | 26.84% |
| Max drawdown | -38.80% | -80.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEMX and KWEB
Explore further