Screener
KWEB vs KGRN
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF vs KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF
Key differences
- KWEB costs 0.09% less per year.
- KWEB is significantly larger than KGRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KWEB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KWEB | KGRN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.3B | $62M |
| Since | 2013 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 7.42% | 0.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -15.2% | +2.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.3% | +2.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.4% | -6.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | 0.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.84% | 23.17% |
| Max drawdown | -80.92% | -66.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KWEB and KGRN
Explore further