Screener
KWEB vs KEMQ
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF vs KraneShares FTSE Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF
Key differences
- KEMQ costs 0.20% less per year.
- KWEB is significantly larger than KEMQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KWEB | KEMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.3B | $39M |
| Since | 2013 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 7.42% | 5.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -15.2% | +33.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.3% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.4% | -2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.84% | 25.86% |
| Max drawdown | -80.92% | -70.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KWEB and KEMQ
Explore further