Screener
KEMX vs OBOR
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF vs KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
Key differences
- KEMX costs 0.55% less per year.
- KEMX is significantly larger than OBOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEMX | OBOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $4M |
| Since | 2019 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 1.84% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +66.1% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.6% | +10.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.2% | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.87% | 15.67% |
| Max drawdown | -38.80% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEMX and OBOR
Explore further