Screener
OBOR vs KEMQ
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF vs KraneShares FTSE Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF
Key differences
- KEMQ costs 0.29% less per year.
- KEMQ is significantly larger than OBOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OBOR | KEMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $39M |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.84% | 5.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.2% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | -3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.67% | 25.64% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -70.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OBOR and KEMQ
Explore further