Screener
KLMN vs PBW
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- KLMN costs 0.55% less per year.
- KLMN is significantly larger than PBW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PBW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KLMN | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $447M |
| Since | 2024 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.34% | 0.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +150.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.32% | 40.29% |
| Max drawdown | -18.54% | -89.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KLMN and PBW
Explore further