Screener
PBW vs QQMG
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
Key differences
- QQMG costs 0.44% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, QQMG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBW | QQMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $447M | $187M |
| Since | 2005 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | 0.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +150.5% | +42.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.29% | 16.91% |
| Max drawdown | -89.06% | -35.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBW and QQMG
Explore further