Screener
KMAR vs VRP
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March vs Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- VRP costs 0.29% less per year.
- VRP is significantly larger than KMAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KMAR is classified as alternative, while VRP is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- KMAR follows a structured outcome strategy; VRP uses index tracking.
- VRP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KMAR | VRP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $35M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 6.39% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.38% | 2.89% |
| Max drawdown | -10.06% | -46.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KMAR and VRP
Explore further