Screener
KMAR vs PGX
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March vs Invesco Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PGX costs 0.29% less per year.
- PGX is significantly larger than KMAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KMAR is classified as alternative, while PGX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- KMAR follows a structured outcome strategy; PGX uses index tracking.
- PGX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KMAR | PGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $35M | $3.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 6.16% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.38% | 6.14% |
| Max drawdown | -10.06% | -34.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KMAR and PGX
Explore further