Screener
KONG vs GSSC
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSSC costs 0.69% less per year.
- GSSC is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while GSSC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; GSSC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GSSC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $952M |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +35.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.90% | 18.69% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -41.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and GSSC
Explore further