Screener
KPHO vs KEMQ
KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF vs KraneShares FTSE Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF
Key differences
Both KPHO and KEMQ are equity ETFs. KPHO charges 1.03% a year and KEMQ 0.50%. The main difference: KEMQ costs 0.53% less per year.
- KEMQ costs 0.53% less per year.
- KEMQ is much larger than KPHO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- KEMQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KPHO | KEMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $41M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +25.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -4.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 26.87% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -70.72% |
Similar to KPHO and KEMQ
Explore further