Screener
KEMQ vs KEMX
KraneShares FTSE Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF vs KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
Key differences
- KEMX costs 0.26% less per year.
- KEMX is significantly larger than KEMQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEMQ | KEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $118M |
| Since | 2017 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 5.39% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.0% | +66.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -3.0% | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.64% | 21.87% |
| Max drawdown | -70.72% | -38.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEMQ and KEMX
Explore further