Screener
KPHO vs KEMX
KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF vs KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
Key differences
Both KPHO and KEMX are equity ETFs. KPHO charges 1.03% a year and KEMX 0.24%. The main difference: KEMX costs 0.79% less per year.
- KEMX costs 0.79% less per year.
- KEMX is much larger than KPHO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- KEMX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KPHO | KEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $134M |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +63.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 23.55% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -38.80% |
Similar to KPHO and KEMX
Explore further