Screener
KPHO vs KGRN
KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF vs KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF
Key differences
Both KPHO and KGRN are equity ETFs. KPHO charges 1.03% a year and KGRN 0.79%. The main difference: KGRN costs 0.24% less per year.
- KGRN costs 0.24% less per year.
- KGRN is much larger than KPHO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- KGRN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KPHO | KGRN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $61M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +0.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +2.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 23.41% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -66.37% |
Similar to KPHO and KGRN
Explore further