Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

KRE vs NANR

State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF

KRE

State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$4.2B

NANR

State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$795M

Key differences

  • KRE is significantly larger than NANR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • KRE is classified as equity, while NANR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • Over the last 3 years, KRE has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • KRE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

KRENANR
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$4.2B$795M
Since20062015
Dividend yield2.25%1.45%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+26.5%+53.9%
CAGR 3Y+24.7%+19.1%
CAGR 5Y+2.7%+16.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.790.81
Volatility 1Y23.30%18.21%
Max drawdown-55.03%-49.15%

Similar to KRE and NANR