Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

KTEC vs KWEB

KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF vs KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

KTEC

KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF

KraneShares

Annual cost

0.69%

Fund size

$58M

KWEB

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

KraneShares

Annual cost

0.70%

Fund size

$6.3B

Key differences

  • KWEB is significantly larger than KTEC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, KTEC has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • KWEB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

KTECKWEB
Annual cost (TER)0.69%0.70%
Fund size (AUM)$58M$6.3B
Since20212013
Dividend yield3.84%7.42%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y-10.8%-15.2%
CAGR 3Y+6.7%+4.3%
CAGR 5YN/A-14.4%
Sharpe 3Y0.260.19
Volatility 1Y27.77%26.84%
Max drawdown-66.90%-80.92%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to KTEC and KWEB