Screener
KWEB vs KLIP
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF vs KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
Key differences
- KWEB costs 0.25% less per year.
- KWEB is significantly larger than KLIP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KWEB is classified as equity, while KLIP is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- KWEB covers emerging markets markets; KLIP covers north america.
- KWEB follows a index tracking strategy; KLIP uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, KLIP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- KWEB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KWEB | KLIP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.3B | $114M |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 7.42% | 28.57% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -15.2% | +1.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.3% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | 0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.84% | 15.47% |
| Max drawdown | -80.92% | -18.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KWEB and KLIP
Explore further