Screener
KWEB vs KEMX
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF vs KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
Key differences
- KEMX costs 0.46% less per year.
- KWEB is significantly larger than KEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- KWEB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KWEB | KEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.3B | $118M |
| Since | 2013 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 7.42% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -15.2% | +74.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.3% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.4% | +14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.84% | 22.26% |
| Max drawdown | -80.92% | -38.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KWEB and KEMX
Explore further