Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

KWEB vs KTEC

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF vs KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF

KWEB

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

KraneShares

Annual cost

0.70%

Fund size

$6.3B

KTEC

KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF

KraneShares

Annual cost

0.69%

Fund size

$58M

Key differences

  • KWEB is significantly larger than KTEC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, KTEC has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • KWEB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

KWEBKTEC
Annual cost (TER)0.70%0.69%
Fund size (AUM)$6.3B$58M
Since20132021
Dividend yield7.42%3.84%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y-15.8%-14.4%
CAGR 3Y+2.4%+5.0%
CAGR 5Y-14.1%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.140.22
Volatility 1Y26.80%27.71%
Max drawdown-80.92%-66.90%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to KWEB and KTEC