Screener
LDSF vs FMHI
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF vs First Trust Municipal High Income ETF
Key differences
- FMHI costs 0.28% less per year.
- FMHI is significantly larger than LDSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LDSF follows a active selection strategy; FMHI uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| LDSF | FMHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $160M | $950M |
| Since | 2019 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.61% | 4.25% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.4% | +7.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.4% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | +1.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.06% | 3.19% |
| Max drawdown | -8.56% | -18.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LDSF and FMHI
Explore further