Screener
LDUR vs MINO
PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- MINO costs 0.15% less per year.
- LDUR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LDUR | MINO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $623M |
| Since | 2014 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 3.83% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.6% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.9% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.56% | 2.67% |
| Max drawdown | -8.68% | -15.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LDUR and MINO
Explore further